元器件交易网讯 3月31日消息，据外媒报道，上周六三星曾对专利如何介绍视频提出异议。苹果曾建议使用最新版本的“专利流程：为陪审员概述”视频，该视频是联邦司法中心（FJC）向陪审员介绍专利制度的影片，以让陪审员做出判断。

　　在第一起苹果与三星专利案例中，陪审员就看类似的视频。然而，经过一年后FJC使用了更新版本视频，取代了更早版本中演员穿着格子上衣（如图）。

　　新的专利介绍视频在YouTube频道美国法院栏目展示。三星对新版本视频提出异议，它指出该视频包含一些使用苹果产品的场景。法官Koh做出判决：三星反对联邦司法中心的新版本专利教学视频无效。（元器件交易网    白玉涛译）    

　　以下为外文：

　　AppleInsider exclusively reported on Saturday that Samsung had raised objections to the "how patents work" video, claiming it would be "highly prejudicial" to expose jurors to the idea that Apple invented original products worthy of being patented.

　　Apple had proposed to use the latest version of "The Patent Process: An Overview for Jurors," a video created by the Federal Judicial Center to provide jurors with an introduction to the patent system.

　　At the beginning of the first Apple vs. Samsung case, jurors were shown a similar video. However, over the past year the the FJC developed an updated version, replacing the dated-looking earlier edition that depicted actors wearing lots of plaid (below).

　　The new video (below) appears on the US Courts YouTube channel, where it is described as being "carefully crafted, in consultation with judges and members of the bar, to present a balanced view of the patent process," noting that "individual judges will want to review it carefully and consult with counsel before deciding whether to use it in a particular case."

　　Samsung has filed an objection to showing the new version of video, stating that "the FJC video includes several scenes in which Apple products are depicted and used."

　　Today, Judge Koh issued a ruling noting that "Samsung's objection to Apple's proposed version of the Federal Judicial Center instructional video (ECF No. 1534) is overruled. The parties shall bring the November 2013 version of the video, 'The Patent Process: An Overview for Jurors,' and shall include the handout referenced in the video in the jury binders."